ABSTRACT
O consumo de psicofármacos é considerado um problema de saúde pública devido ao potencial de dependência e ocorrência de eventos adversos. Nesse contexto, o presente estudo teve como objetivo caracterizar o consumo de psicofármacos dispensados em unidades básicas de saúde de Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil. Conduziu-se um estudo ecológico, com consulta à base de dados Hygia de 2008 a 2012. Foram extraídas as variáveis: psicofármaco dispensado, quantidade dispensada no ano, sexo e faixa etária dos pacientes. Para cada psicofármaco foi calculada a dose diária definida por 1.000 habitantes/dia (DDD/1.000PD), a dose diária definida por 1.000 habitantes/dia considerando-se 75% da população (DDD75%/1.000PD) que retiraram medicamento pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e a dose diária prescrita (DDP). Comparou-se a taxa de crescimento populacional com a de crescimento do consumo dos medicamentos. Foram identificados 1.577.241 pacientes que retiraram medicamentos no período avaliado, dos quais 287.373 (18,2%) utilizaram pelo menos um sujeito a controle especial. Houve aumento do consumo total dos psicofármacos (DDD/1.000PD), porém, após a comparação com a taxa de crescimento populacional, apenas a da sertralina (p = 0,021), risperidona (p = 0,034) e do clonazepam (p = 0,043) foram superiores. As DDP de sete fármacos estavam maiores que a DDD da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). As discrepâncias entre DDD e DDP podem ser úteis como estratégia para triar pacientes elegíveis ao cuidado farmacêutico, pois podem contribuir na prevenção de morbimortalidade relacionada ao uso de medicamentos.
The consumption of psychotropic drugs is considered a public health problem, due to the potential for addiction and the occurrence of adverse events. In this context, the current study aimed to characterize the consumption of psychotropic medications dispensed in primary healthcare units in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State, Brazil. This ecological study consulted the Hygia database from 2008 to 2012. The following variables were extracted: psychotropic drugs dispensed, amount dispensed per year, and patients' sex and age bracket. For each psychotropic drug, we calculated the defined daily dose per 1,000 inhabitants/day (DDD/1,000PD), defined daily dose per 1,000 inhabitants/day considering 75% of the population (DDD75%/1,000PD) who withdrew medicines through the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS), and the prescribed daily dose (PDD). The study compared the population growth rate to the growth in the medicines' consumption. A total of 1,577,241 patients were identified who withdrew medications during the study period, of whom 287,373 (18.2%) used at least one drug subject to special control. There was an increase in the total consumption of psychotropic drugs (DDD/1,000PD), but comparison to the population growth rate showed that only sertraline (p = 0.021), risperidone (p = 0.034), and clonazepam (p = 0.043) presented higher growth rates. The PDD for seven drugs were higher than the World Health Organization (WHO) DDD. Identifying discrepancies between DDD and PDD can be useful as a strategy for screening patients eligible for pharmaceutical care, since they can contribute to the prevention of morbidity and mortality related to medications.
El consumo de psicofármacos está considerado un problema de salud pública, debido al potencial de dependencia y ocurrencia de eventos adversos. En este contexto, el presente estudio tuvo como objetivo caracterizar el consumo de psicofármacos dispensados en unidades básicas de salud de Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil. Se realizó un estudio ecológico, con consulta a la base de datos Hygia de 2008 a 2012. Se extrajeron las variables: psicofármaco dispensado, cantidad dispensada al año, sexo y franja de edad de los pacientes. Para cada psicofármaco se calculó la dosis diaria definida por 1.000 habitantes/día (DDD/1.000PD), la dosis diaria definida por 1.000 habitantes/día, considerándose un 75% de la población (DDD75%/1.000PD) que consiguieron el medicamento por el Sistema Único de Salud (SUS) y la dosis diaria prescrita (DDP). Se comparó la tasa de crecimiento poblacional con la de crecimiento por consumo de medicamentos. Se identificaron a 1.577.241 pacientes que obtuvieron medicamentos durante el período evaluado, entre los cuales 287.373 (18,2%) utilizaron por lo menos uno sujeto a un control especial. Hubo un aumento en el consumo total de los psicofármacos (DDD/1000PD), no obstante, tras la comparación con la tasa de crecimiento poblacional, solamente la de consumo de sertralina (p = 0,021), risperidona (p = 0,034) y del clonazepam (p = 0,043) fueron superiores. Las DDP de siete fármacos eran mayores a la DDD de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Las discrepancias entre DDD y DDP pueden ser útiles como estrategia para triar pacientes elegibles para el cuidado farmacéutico, puesto que pueden contribuir a la prevención de morbimortalidad relacionada con el uso de medicamentos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Primary Health Care , Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage , Brazil , Government ProgramsABSTRACT
Background There is a worrisome increase in opioid prescription worldwide. Their use and overuse may cause adverse outcomes. Aim To determine incidence and characteristics of opioid prescription at discharge at an emergency department (ED). Material and Methods A prospective observational study in a random sample of adult patients attended at an ED of a teaching hospital. We reviewed medical records prescriptions for each patient to collect information about drugs prescribed, reason and medical indication of use (doses and duration). Results A total of 1,001 patients aged 50 ± 20 years (61% women) were studied. Seven percent of patients received an opioid prescription at discharge from the ED, mainly to treat renal and back pain. The dose, duration of treatments or both were incompletely described in 54% of prescriptions. The dose of tramadol in drops was incomplete in 96% of prescriptions. Conclusions Seven percent of patients discharged from an ED received an opioid prescription, mainly to treat non-oncological acute pain. The lack of information detected in the prescriptions affected quality, safety and effectiveness of the treatment, especially when pharmaceutical formulations were drops.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Reference Values , Time Factors , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Chile , Prospective Studies , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
La seguridad de los pacientes críticos en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI), ha sido progresivamente reconocida como un componente esencial de la práctica de la medicina intensiva moderna. La creación y promoción de equipos multidisciplinarios liderados por un intensivista ha demostrado mejorar la seguridad de la atención de salud. La incorporación de un farmacéutico con entrenamiento especializado a la UCI, ha generado un impacto positivo en los desenlaces clínicos y económicos. El fomento de la cultura de la seguridad en la UCI y el rediseño de los procesos defectuosos pueden mejorar significativamente la seguridad y calidad de la atención de los pacientes críticos.
The safety of critically ill patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) has been increasingly recognized as an essential component of the practice of modern intensive care. The creation and promotion of intensivist-led multidisciplinary teams has shown to improve the safety of health care. The addition in the ICU of a pharmacist with specialized training has generated a positive impact on clinical and economic outcomes. The promotion of safety culture in the ICU and the redesign of faulty processes can significantly improve the safety and quality of care of critically ill patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Patient Care Team , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Critical Illness , Critical Care/organization & administration , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Pharmaceutical Services , Quality Control , Safety , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administrationABSTRACT
Background: Data from the Ministry of Health show that in Chile in 2004, 17 percent of the population had some form of depression and mood disorders are the tenth cause of disability-adjusted Ufe years (DALY) loss. Aim: To determine consumption of antidepressants (ADs) in Chile from 1992 to 2004. Material and methods: National sales data were obtained from the company IMS Health Chile and converted into defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1,000 inhabitants per day Available ADs were classified in four pharmacological groups (i.e., serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, SNRIs; selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs; tricyclic antidepressants, TCAs; and others). Total economic burden of ADs utilization and cost per DDDs were also calculated. Trends over time were analyzed using Pearson-R2. Results: Total ADs consumption in Chile measured by DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DHD) increased linearly (y =0.901x+1.9129; R2 =0.9296; p <0.001) from 2.5 in 1992 to 11.7 in 2004 (total growth of 470.2 percent). SSRIs were the drug class with higher consumption, and fluoxetine the most commonly consumed antidepressant. SSRIs were the drugs that dominated the market representing 79 percent of the total drug consumption throughout the years. Total economic burden of ADs in Chile (total cost of DDDs consumed) increased from US$65.4 million in 2001 to US$74.6 million in 2004 (14 percent increase). Average cost per DDD of all AD increased linearly, however not significantly from US$ 0.94 in 2001 to US$ 1.04 in 2004 (y =0.0362x+0.8784; R2 =0.7382; p =0,262). Conclusions: DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day increased linearly over 470 percent from 1992-2004. SSRIs were the most commonly consumed drugs in Chile. Future research should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antidepressants in Chile, comparing the results with drug utilization, and determining if unnecessary expenditures have been paid out.